Resources filed an application to appeal the
refusal of their mine in the Land and Environment Court before
Christmas.
Normally the Planning Minister instructs the
Planning Assessment Commission (PAC) to hold a ‘public hearing’, which
under the Act extinguishes the right to file for a merits review of the
planning decision
with the courts – limiting appeals to procedural review only. However,
in the case of the Rocky Hill coal mine, the minister did not instruct
the PAC to hold a public hearing and therefore merits review is
accessible.
“This is an act of
bastardry from the planning minister which effectively gives GRL
Resources a backdoor way to get their coal mine approved. It’s
instructive that the Minister extinguishes
merit review for most mining projects, but has chosen not do so in this
case,” said Greens MP Jeremy Buckingham.
“The
referral letter to the PAC
explicitly states that the minister decided to allow merits review
because the mine was recommended for refusal by the Department of
Planning.
“The inconsistent application of merits
review rights effectively means there is one rule for the community and
another rule for the mining industry.
“No doubt the minister would prefer the
court approve the mine, rather than the government given that the seat
of Upper Hunter is highly marginal.
2 February 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment